Here’s Cindy Bruchman‘s thoughts on Stranger on a Train (1951). This is the 37th review for our Alfred Hitchcock blogathon.
Thanks Cindy for participating in this!
Alfred Hitchcock hired Raymond Chandler to write the script for the 1950 book adaptation of Strangers on a Train. Considered a masterpiece by Roger Ebert (read his review here: http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/strangers-on-a-train-1951 ), there was a lot to ooh and ahh about the film because of the skillful camera work by Hitchcock. Not everyone loved the film. Raymond Chandler criticized Hitchcock for altering his script so much. He complained to Hitchcock in a letter:
“What I cannot understand is your permitting a script which after all had some life and vitality to be reduced to such a flabby mass of clichés, a group of faceless characters, and the kind of dialogue every screen writer is taught not to write—the kind that says everything twice and leaves nothing to be implied by the actor or the camera.”
Read the scathing letter in its entirety here: http://www.lettersofnote.com/2012/01/flabby-mass-of-cliches.html
Predictable dialogue, wooden cartoonish characters, and absurd plot aside, perhaps these dings dent the overall composition of the film, but it doesn’t take away from the last half of the film’s suspenseful rise to the fantastic climax on the merry-go-round in an amusement park. It is a worthwhile cinematic experience.
Hitchcock opens with close-up shots of two sets of shoes getting on a train. Thus begins the meeting of two strangers. Robert Walker played the bored, garrulous Bruno Antony, a socialite cushioned by the wealth of his New York father and batty mother. He recognized pro-tennis player Guy Haines, played by Farley Granger and pesters the celebrity about his upcoming divorce he read about in the social column of the newspaper. An elaborate plot constructed by Bruno Antony ensues. Bruno will kill Guy’s scheming wife if Guy kill Bruno’s father.
Alfred Hitchcock and wife of 50 years, Alma Reville, had one daughter. Pat Hitchcock played a supporting role as the young, sassy daughter, Barbara Morton, in Strangers on a Train. Barbara and sexy-with-glasses adulteress, Miriam, were my two favorite characters, easily outshining the rest of the cast.
Pat Hitchcock as Barbara
Alfred Hitchcock is famous for hiring blonde bombshells to star in his movies but not in this one. Thick rimmed glasses play a role in the film. Barbara represents smarts while Mirriam represents sexuality, and they are the core of the film’s strength. They also parallel the two males–Guy Haines is wholesome and nice while Bruno Antony is manipulative and insane. Props play a larger role when you consider Guy Haine’s lighter found at the crime site. Hitchcock gives importance to these props when he shoots them with long close-ups.
Two favorite scenes showcasing Hitchcock’s innovation behind the camera happen during a tennis match and an amusement park. If you haven’t seen the film, keep a look out at the tennis match and watch how the crowd moves their head in sync to the left and right, but in the center of the stands, Guy Haines stares back at you. At the end of the film, in the amusement park notice how the carousel plays garish music and the petrified plaster-painted animals are in a nightmare. Their expressions compliment the human struggle taking place. It’s an original, perfect place to have a showdown. Have you seen Strangers on a Train? Rent it quick if you haven’t for the cinematography and decide for yourself if Raymond Chandler has a legitimate gripe against Hitchcock’s script.
I’ve seen this one! I liked it but I thought some of it dragged on and on. Like – I didn’t catch that in the tennis match crowd – I thought “why is he showing the entire tennis match????”
Overall – this was a good one : )
The movement of the match compliments the need for Guy to hurry up to leave and intersect Bruno. Then the singular stare across the court shows the obsession of Bruno–great suspense.
One of my favourite of his. And such a great premise.
I loved the camera angles throughout. The premise is original but I thought it weak that just an initial meeting would create enough motivation for murder.
i’ve been waiting for the blogathon to get to this film. one of Hitchcock’s best, with a truly brilliant performance by Robert Walker, and genuine edge of your seat moments (there’s a great bit where Walker drops the lighter through the sewer grate). I think hitchcock or his cameraman made the right choice in filming this in black and white, as the photography is brilliant, especially, as you point out, in the carousel scene. Thanks for posting the link to the Chandler letter.
I thought the letter interesting although I have heard Chandler was bemoaning a draft and not the final product. Still, interesting the screenwriter wants to “own” the film, but director sees things differently.
Thanks Rob for letting me join the group. 🙂
appreciate your contribution
hope it was formatted well enough for u
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review of a Hitchcock Classic, Cindy. : )
Thank you! It was a film I hadn’t seen and watched it for this blogathan. Wonderful film. 🙂
Gotta check this one out. Great work Cindy!
Thanks a lot! Hitchcock provides a lot of clues and details waiting for dissection. I love the game.
Thank you for participating Cindy, great review!
Zoe, your blogathan is a huge success! I have enjoyed reading all the reviews. Nice of you and Rob to host it. It’s a lot of work, I’m sure. 🙂
Pingback: Alfred Hitchcock Blogathon Conclusion | The Sporadic Chronicles of a Beginner Blogger
Pingback: Alfred Hitchcock Blogathon Recap |
Great job, CIndy! God, this is another one I really need to see, isn’t it? I feel like this, The Birds, and Rear Window are all vying for my attention now. Hahaha. So much excellent Hitchcock to watch!