007 December – Moonraker (1979) – Film Grimoire


007-December Blogathon

Here’s a review of Moonraker (1979) by Anna of Film Grimoire.

Thanks Anna!

177741

Moonraker (1979, dir. Lewis Gilbert) is also known as “Bond in Space”, because it’s the film where the one and only James Bond – this time played by the very charming Roger Moore – actually makes it out to the vast expanse of space. But in the beginning, before the outer space shenanigans occur, Bond is assigned on a secret mission to respond to a critical incident where an MI6 space shuttle has been hijacked. It seems that a millionaire named Hugo Drax is involved, and Bond must investigate this suspicious individual to prevent further damage to the British Crown.

Some say that Roger Moore’s interpretation of James Bond is too silly or too much of a parody of himself, to which I disagree. Roger Moore’s Bond is certainly not the most serious of the bunch, but it’s his sneaky charm and boyish irreverence that make his Bond films a lot of fun. Moore’s performance is counterbalanced by a slightly weak Bond girl in the form of Holly Goodhead (Lois Chiles), and a cartoonish villain in Hugo Drax, played by Michael Lonsdale. One of the standout co-stars of the film is Richard Kiel, reprising his role as the classic henchman Jaws, whose scenes in this film humanise his destructive tendencies that are on display in this and in The Spy Who Loved Me (1977).

moonrakersuit6

Some people also say that Moonraker is one of the worst Bond films of all time. To that, I also completely disagree (not to mention, some of the other films are much, much worse). Moonraker plays host to some of the weirdest and most random stuff of all of the Bond films, but it’s also home to some of the more iconic and suspenseful moments of the series. Whenever I talk about Moonraker I always talk about the double-taking pigeon in the scene where Bond jets across St Marks Square in Venice in a boat that can operate on land, which is the height of the film’s silliness. But some key moments such as the ultimate double entendre of “I think he’s attempting re-entry, sir”, the trope of the fight on the cable car, the pushing of a threat out of a space shuttle hatch door (referenced in the Austin Powers films), and the snooping and espionage to sort out exactly who Hugo Drax is and why he is a threat, all equally ensure that Moonraker is filled with lots of little moments that will thrill and excite most viewers.

If any criticism can be levelled at Moonraker, it’s that the film does have some strange lull points in the story where the viewer can get a bit sleepy. It’s quite a long film, and at times the story feels overstretched. Additionally, when the space action does start happening, it’s a bit Star Wars­-ish with lasers shooting everywhere to the point of being funny; especially given that Moonraker was essentially created to pander to that emerging sci-fi film market at the time. If you can’t handle cheesiness, this is not the Bond film for you. Even though there are some seriously sinister moments in this film, you know what kind of film you’re in for when the pre-title sequence includes footage of a villain falling through the sky only to be cushioned by a circus tent.

moonrakerMaybe the fact that this is one of the more self-aware Bond films is why I really love it. This space drama is quite compelling, and when I look back on the film, there are a number of separate scenes that stand out and cause Moonraker to claim a coveted spot in my top 5 list of all the Bond films. Roger Moore is one of my favourite Bonds due to his humour and charm. Perhaps people who are fans of the Bonds played by Sean Connery or Timothy Dalton may not like this film as much due to its outlandish nature, but if you’re able to tolerate silliness, Moonraker really is all in good fun.

4/5
Watch the trailer here.

7 thoughts on “007 December – Moonraker (1979) – Film Grimoire

  1. I have a soft spot for Moonraker, but I have to admit that it’s pretty terrible. If you take it as a comedy instead of an action film, it works a lot better. It isn’t as bad as Diamonds are Forever or Die Another Day and it certainly isn’t boring. Still, I’m not as high on it as you are. I agree that it’s weird and random, but I wonder if that’s always a good thing.

    Like

    • That’s my problem, I think its overt cheesiness and possible terribleness is one of my most favourite things about it, but it really isn’t for everyone. I would easily place Diamonds Are Forever and Die Another Day as the bottom two on my Bond rankings list though, they are both just awful!

      Like

  2. Pingback: MovieRob’s 007 December Blogathon: Moonraker (1979) | FILM GRIMOIRE

Let me Know what you think!!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.