Argumentative August #46 – Rules of Engagement (2000) – Ten Stars or Less


courtroom

Ryan and I would like to once again welcome you to another review for our Argumentative August Blogathon.

 

This next film, Rules of Engagement (2000) is being reviewed by Ryan of Ten Stars or Less

 

Let’s see what Ryan thought of this movie….

__________________________________

 

 

rulesofengagement
What did I like?

I was a big fan of this movie when it came in 2000 and have owned it on DVD since its release. Rules of Engagement is a fantastic story about honour, respect, and duty. A great aspect of the story is how Samuel L Jackson’s character does his assigned job, but when the job turns into a mess, he is thrown to the wolves for punishment.

What didn’t I like?

There is not a whole lot I didn’t like about the movie, although with that being said they could have focused a little more time on the trial.

Was Rules of Engagement a good story?

Some people could sit back and compare Rules of Engagement to A Few Good Men as one of the best military trial movies, even though they are completely different themes. This film is a solid story about the rules of combat and the honour/respect Marines have for one another on and off the field.

Notable Performances?

There are five notable performances. The guys include Jackson as Colonel Saunders and Tommy Lee Jones as his lawyer who is a washed up Marine who is asked to save his best friend. On the flip side, Guy Pierce is a great cut throat Marine lawyer who is willing to push for the harshest punishment possible, because he firmly believes in the merits of the case. Bruce Greenwood is as dirty as it comes and his performance in this film as made me hate him (and characters he plays) for a long time. In a small role Ben Kingsley plays the ambassador who changes his story on a consistent basis to please his superiors and avoid the truth at all costs.

Would I recommend it?

Yes, Rules of Engagement will please military personnel and movie goers at the same time. It provides a great story about honour and friendship that doesn’t go deep into all the legal details, but just enough to keep you interested in the outcome of the trial.

 

my star rating: 8 out 10

imdb: 6.3 out 10 / metascore: 45/100 / rottentomatoes: 36% out 100%

roger ebert: 2.5 out 4 / richard crouse: n/a

4 thoughts on “Argumentative August #46 – Rules of Engagement (2000) – Ten Stars or Less

  1. Just wanted to let you know that I am watching Philadelphia tonight and will have my review for the deadline tomorrow. I was going to do it over the weekend but I couldn’t find anywhere to rent it so I had to buy the DVD and wait for it to be delivered!

    Liked by 1 person

Let me Know what you think!!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.