For this month’s next review for Genre Grandeur – Adventure Films, here’s a review of Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade (1989) by Damien of Flashback/Backslide
Thanks again to Damien of Riley on Film for choosing this month’s genre.
Next month’s Genre has been chosen by Summer of Serendipitous Anachronisms She has chosen quite a unique genre and we will be reviewing our favorite Derivative Work Movies.
Here’s Summer to explain her choice:
Basically it is anything based or inspired by pre-existing source
for example:
Amelie takes its relationships from the Luncheon of the Boating Party
The Magnificent Seven is borrowed from the Seven Samurai
Sunday in the Park with George is based on painting by George Seurat
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is loosely based on Hamlet
My Own Private Idaho borrows from Henry the IV
Cosi is about a director directing the musical Cosi Fan Tutti
Pride Prejudice and Zombies borrows from Pride and Prejudice
Clueless borrows from the novel Emma
Monty Python and the Holy Grail borrows from the Arthurian Legend
Basically a film that borrows from pre-existing source but reinvents the source material into something else
Please get me your submissions by the 25th of June by sending them to derivativesummer@movierob.net Try to think out of the box! Great choice Summer!
Let’s see what Damien thought of this movie:
_________________________________
Raiders of the Lost Ark may be a classic but Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade will always be my first Indiana Jones movie (for the longest time I thought this was actually the first film to be released). When reviewing Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, I mentioned how uninspired substitutions sucked the fun out of the film. Now in its third installment, the franchise shifts again to much better results.
After detouring into a world of Thuggee cults, The Last Crusade again features Nazis as the primary antagonists. This time they’re after the Holy Grail and (as in Raiders) they use Indy to find it for them. That element was missing in Temple of Doom. In both Raiders and The Last Crusade the villains (which happen to be Nazis both times) force Indy to lead their search. This adds more drama and tension as in both cases Indy wants to find the treasure himself but doesn’t want it to fall into the wrong hands. This is an old format still used by modern adventure movies like National Treasure. In Temple of Doom, Indy instead tries to retrieve the sought after object from the cult who already possesses it. The film feels less adventurous that way but Last Crusade brings back the thrill of the chase and with it more adventure.
In a great twist, the film starts with a young Indy fighting to keep a golden cross away from object-poachers. The flashback establishes much of Indy’s backstory (and appearance, showing how he got his chin scar, why he hates snakes, and presumably when he first picked up his signature whip) and helps lead us into the introduction of Indy’s father Harry Jones, played perfectly by Sean Connery. Between Harrison Ford’s one liners (like the “no ticket” line) and the bantering between Ford and Connery, Last Crusade keeps things light even with all the Nazis running around. Raiders debuted as a classic in 1981. Last Crusade may never reach the same levels of success but it is still a worthy sequel which manages to establish its own identity.
Rating: 8/10
Pingback: Genre Grandeur May Finale – Castaway – Riley on Film |
Pingback: Indiana Jones week: Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade | Flashback/Backslide
Pingback: reblogged: Genre Grandeur May Finale – Castaway – Riley on Film - Riley on Film