Did They Get it Right? – Best Actor – Oscars 1935

Here are the five nominees: (Winner in Bold)

Clark Gable (Mutiny on the Bounty)
Charles Laughton (Mutiny on the Bounty)
Victor McLaglen (The Informer)
Franchot Tone (Mutiny on the Bounty)

Biggest Snub:

Charles Laughton – Ruggles of Red Gap  (eventhough an actor can’t get two nominations in same category)
Fredric March – Les Miserables

My Overall Thoughts:

This was a historical year since it was the sole time that 3 actors from the same film were all nominated in the same category, essentially cancelling each other out.  There was a write in campaign for Paul Muni in Black Fury, but since he wasn’t on the official ballot, he can’t be counted.

My Rankings:

Acting Performances

4. Clark Gable 
3. Franchot Tone 
2. Victor McLaglen
1. Charles Laughton


2. Mutiny on the BountyLater productions were much better and I found this depiction a bit boring even with Laughton and Gable on board.
1. The Informer Great look into the motives of people when they must do things when feel they have no other choice. The pacing is great and Ford does a great job getting the emotional impact of the story from numerous perspectives.

Do I agree with the Oscar winner? – Not Really!  McLaglen won because the other three split their votes since they were all from the same film. Laughton is the most powerful and memorable performance of the 3, despite the fact that the film itself doesn’t age very well and is not the best production of the famous story.

Let me know what you think about these films and my rankings!

2 thoughts on “Did They Get it Right? – Best Actor – Oscars 1935

  1. I haven’t seen Mutiny in the Bounty in ages, but I absolutely loved Laughton in Ruggles of Red Gap. I have honestly never heard of The Informer, so I’ll have to check that out. I have really been enjoying this series, so thanks for the interesting content!


  2. You preferred the Brando version? Mel Gibson? McLaglen was very good as The Informer, but can’t argue with theory that the 3 from Mutiny canceled one another out. Laughton was terrific – also had the “villainous” role which is usually meatier to play. Nothing for The 39 Steps – or for Errol Flynn – buckling his swash in Captain Blood. Trivia: rumor had it that john Ford had McLaglen constantly boozed up so he wouldn’t launch into his usual scenery chewing mode – and lay the role more introspective and subdued.


Let me Know what you think!!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.